Findings

“To believe in progress does not mean believing that progress has already taken place. This would not be belief.” — Franz Kafka, Reflections on Sin, Suffering & Hope

The groovi and gyri of your cerebral cortex identify you like your fingerprint.

“If — as some physical theories speculate — there is only one possible initial state of the universe and only one self-consistent set of physical laws, then the initial state required no bits of information to describe.” — Seth Lloyd

Goldbach’s conjecture: Every even number greater or equal to 4 is the sum of two prime numbers.

Doogie mice are mice that have been genetically altered to be smarter. Enrichment of the environment improves the cognitive performance of control animals but not of Doogie mice.

A state of a multiplayer game is Pareto optimal if there is no solution which is better for ALL participants. A state is a Nash equilibrium if NO player can improve his situation by changing only his own strategy.

Subliminal (16ms) unconscious stimuli have a measurable influence on your consumption behavior IF you are thirsty. And you will not be aware of the fact that such stimuli were shown to you.

Thermodynamic depth, a complexity measure for physical systems, relates the entropy of a system to the number of possible historical paths that led to their state.

If the same odor is present during slow-wave sleep that is present during learning new things, this improves performance. Induced slow oscillations by electric stimulation also improve declarative learning.

Distinguish horizontal from vertical explanations. Horizontal explanations correlate events on the same level of detail, they tell us why a certain event happened. Vertical explanations are explanations in terms of the level(s) below. They tell us why a certain generalization holds. If you get a horizontal explanation and still feel the need to ask “why?”, look for vertical explanations.

“We say we measure time with clocks, but we see only the hands of the clocks, not time itself. And the hands of a clock are a physical variable like any other. So in a sense we cheat because what we really observe are physical variables as a function of other physical variables, but we represent that as if everything is evolving in time.” — discovermagazine.com

Epistemic actions are actions that are intended not to change the world but to minimize the computational load on your brain. For example, walking around a chessboard, reshuffling your cards. Actions that could have taken place in your mind, were your mind not extended into the world.

The majority of the connections from the prefrontal cortex to other brain areas is inhibitory. Is what we perceive as conscious control not so much involved in the creation and execution of plans but mostly in their inhibition?

Is the distinction between autopilot and deep thought not a distinction between planning vs. not planning, but a distinction between attention vs. no attention?

Duality: Map your problem to another space, find a solution there and map it back to get the solution you need. Think Category theory.

Patients with brain damage that prevents REM sleep do not appear to have a memory deficit.

Children below the age of four do not have a concept of what other people know. They believe that their knowledge is equal to other people’s knowledge. As soon as they learn something, they suppose that others know it, too.

Apes seem to understand basic intentions, but not cooperative intentions.

A brain area could respond to a stimulus by not responding while most other areas are active.

Use machine learning to create thousands hypotheses for lots of small patches of a brain in parallel, test the predictive value of each of them and discard all but those that work.

Four challenges to mind reading based on machine learning: The temporal and spatial resolution of current scanners; the potentially “unlimited” number of thoughts vs training on specific patterns; some types of brain activity have stereotypical patterns across people (e.g. lying), others seem not to; individuals change over time.

1 is not a prime number because factorization needs to be unique.

Perfect numbers are numbers that are equal to the sum of their proper divisors. 6 = 3 + 2 +1. Are there any odd perfect numbers?

Goal-directedness means equifinality: Different initial states lead to the same final state. Goal-directedness implies a reduction in entropy.

We know no good reasons why neurons have dendritic trees beyond increasing the surface area for synapses from other neurons.

Four different types of answers to the question why a certain animal behaves in a certain way: Proximate cause; current survival value; ontogeny (development of the individual); phylogeny (development of the species).

Humans were linguistic 100.000 years ago.

All of your mitochondrial DNA is from your mother.

Acheulean hand axes have been produced practically unchanged for over a million years. Many have been found in a state of not having been used at all. Social artefacts?

We are the only species vulnerable to ideas. Think religion. Freedom. Democracy. Justice.

Language digitizes.

In an experiment, children and chimpanzees try to get food out of a box after being shown a technique with an unnecessary additional step. Chimpanzees leave out the unnecessary step. Children copy the whole procedure.

Be precise.

4 Comments

  1. Beautiful poem.

  2. Beautiful puzzling pieces of our world but there are some of your lines that are mere claims, I maintain. Evidence, give me evidence ;).

    1. “Children below the age of four do not have a concept of what other people know. [...]”

    My experiences with my sister (2 years) seem to contradict this statement: She is perfectly able to recognize what she knows and what others know. If you read some book to her she often gets suck of this activity, because she recognizes that there is something about the book (so words) that she cannot understand (so read). We made this finding in many other situations as well: When somebody plays the xylophone she takes away the thing with which you generate the music on the xylophone, not because she wants to play now (as many children do when observing others with their belongings), no, she takes it and put it down on the table as if she wanted to say: “I don’t want you to play, because I cannot either.” We’ve observed that in many different occasions. Very interesting. i

    2. “Apes seem to understand basic intentions, but not cooperative intentions.”

    What do you mean by “cooperative intentions”? This statement somehow struggles with my intuitions.

    3. “We know no good reasons why neurons have dendritic trees beyond increasing the surface area for synapses from other neurons.”

    I don’t understand why this should not be a good reason for existence…If there are hundreds of synapses but there is no place for them to dock to it should be worth having enough surface.

    4. “We are the only species vulnerable to ideas. Think religion. Freedom. Democracy. Justice.”

    Well…let’s not quarrel much about this, but justice? I guess there are lots of examples for justice in the animal kingdom, aren’t there?

  3. 1. False-belief tasks:

    The results of research using false-belief tasks have been fairly consistent: most normally-developing children are unable to pass the tasks until around the age of three or four. The conclusion from this research has thus been that most children do not begin to have any mature theory of mind abilities until this time.

    2. Tomasello:

    Apes communicate with conspecifics most flexibly in the gestural domain, including adapting to the attentional state of the recipient. They use both intention movements (abbreviations of social actions that become communicative within a specific interactive context) and attention getters (actions that gain the attention of others to the self in a wide variety of contexts). [..] They are also all basically “competitive” – aimed at getting the signaler what she wants – not co-operative in the sense of sharing psychological states. Interestingly, when interacting with humans many apes do learn to “point” to things they want triadically. But these “points” are action imperatives only; they are not co-operative in the human sense (and may not even be truly referential), as evidenced by the fact that these pointing apes still do not understand when humans point for them informatively.

    3. The idea (as I understand it) is that the specific setup of dendrites (e.g. how far the locations where other neurons synapse onto them are removed from the cell body) seems to have an influence on the computations that go on within our brain, but that we do not have a good theory of how specifically such a dendritic setup is useful, in contrast to other possible strategies of surface enlargement.

    4. Do you know any animals that would die for the idea of justice?

  4. Thanks for the answers. To the first point, I think, to pass this false belief task is only one ability in our mind. Perhaps my little sister could not say, if asked, what I know and she also knows or doesn’t know, respectively. So it’s perhaps more about beliefs as the test suggests and not about knowledge itself. Maybe, she don’t know what I belief but she knows what I know better ;) .

Write a Comment